Autonerdz Home Autonerdz FAQ User’s Comments Autonerdz Events Autonerdz Store Contact Autonerdz

Autonerdz forums

 
  Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
Autonerdz - Since 2000, North America's Authority on PicoScope
 
  HomeHelpSearch Member Map Event CalendarRegisterLogin  
 
question on scope vs scanner (Read 748 times)
kicksbutt
Guru Member
Picogroup
****
Offline


I'm an Autonerd

Posts: 252

litchfield park az, Arizona, USA
litchfield park az
Arizona
USA

question on scope vs scanner
Mar 5th, 2013 at 8:07pm
 
Hello all new to this site been doing alot of research and stumbled here. I am wanting a new scanner have an older genysis still works but needs some updateing was thinking of getting the pegysis that comes with a 2 channel scope. Now that I am here I am thinking that might not be my best choice. I only have enough cash for one or the other also if Pico is the resounding answer. Would a 2 or 4 channel be my best best? Thanks in advance for all your help
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
KarlW
LSD Guide
Picogroup
*****
Offline


Picoscope In The Ville

Posts: 1,347

Somerville, Massachusetts, USA
Somerville
Massachusetts
USA

Gender: male
Re: question on scope vs scanner
Reply #1 - Mar 6th, 2013 at 3:48am
 
kicksbutt wrote on Mar 5th, 2013 at 8:07pm:
Would a 2 or 4 channel be my best best


I'm sure everyone here will tell you to save for the 4 channel. I know from my experience, a buddy of mine just got a 12000 snap on 2 channel(he didn't think to ask me)We have been playing a couple nights a week with his so he can learn how to use it. The other night he had a 2000 explorer with poor fuel mileage and hesitation no DTC's at his shop.  Yes, it was at another garage and fitted with a CMP synchro assembly too. We had his deployed on CMP/CKP but we were missing something. yup cyl sync.so a third channel would have been faster.Oh yeah we had My Pico deployed at the same time on the same signals but I had secondary on CHC my 3rd channel. so we did verify that CMP was 180 off. by one capture.from Pico not from the 2 channel. Not a big deal? right? to me it was.
Last but not least. If you do decide to purchase a Picoscope.. Save up for the 4 channel and if you wanna learn how to use it buy it from Tom.Smiley
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ward Zintel
Super Nerd
Picogroup
*****
Offline



Posts: 632

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Saskatoon
Saskatchewan
Canada

Gender: male
Re: question on scope vs scanner
Reply #2 - Mar 6th, 2013 at 4:54am
 
Hello!
I agree with Karl, and that is exactly what I did - just hung on and waited until I had the means to buy the 4 channel. From a learning stand point it makes no difference, the 4 channel is not more "complicated", just more channels to use as required. Ditto for buying it through Tom for the Autonerdz support, the amount of things these scopes will do makes coming back to the forums for training, the waveform database etc, and just the "Ureka" momonents that
come from reading on here worth every cent.
-Ward- Smiley
Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 6th, 2013 at 10:44am by Ward Zintel »  

Wayne's Driveline
Saskatoon, Sk.
 
IP Logged
 
RtOne
Super Nerd
Picogroup
*****
Offline


"If We Can't Fix It" -
"It Ain't Broke"

Posts: 657

Westville, Illinois, Illinois, USA
Westville, Illinois
Illinois
USA

Gender: male
Re: question on scope vs scanner
Reply #3 - Mar 6th, 2013 at 5:33am
 
I did quite a bit of research when Pegisys was rolling out a few years ago.  The initial specs were very poor, communication was iffy and OTC was really SNOTTY when I called to speak with Tech Service. I have an older OTC Genisys in the stable and as with most OTC products you only get the functionality some pencil pusher decides you need, because they have to pay for the functions, so the Tech guy told me when I asked about what I knew I was already missing. I sorta feel the Scan Tool is primarily a compass, to point you in the right direction sooner, a four channel scope will pinpoint the discrepancy much sooner, and it's a hell-of-a lot more fun.  In all fairness, about the same time Snap On left a Verus for me to try, I didn't even turn the scope on, I knew that with a 500MHz processor, the best it could do was serf the web (Slowly) and scan data seemed really delayed. So I didn't fall for that one either, (TURD, in a nice case) comes to mind. Smiley

X 3 on the ongoing support at AutoNerdz and PICO.  It has as much if not more value than the Equipment.
Back to top
 

Adult Day Care By Lew Winegardner
WWW WWW roar1@sbcglobal.net  
IP Logged
 
jarvissamuel
Super Nerd
Picogroup
*****
Offline


I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 1,154

Denver Colorado, Colorado, USA
Denver Colorado
Colorado
USA

Re: question on scope vs scanner
Reply #4 - Mar 6th, 2013 at 7:16am
 
My opinion is the scanner will be dependent on what you service most.  If there is a ton of one make that is serviced checking out a factory scan tool for that would probably cost less than the Pegisys and allow to be worlds ahead in ability.

For a overall decent aftermarket scanner for domestic and some Asian, I have had good luck with the Snap On Solus pro I don't think it can be purchased new anymore (Solus ultra now) but it has treated me pretty well.  If you are willing to give up bidirectional controls the Snap On Ethos might be worth checking out as well.

A scope from Tom in either the 2ch or 4ch would be the way to go.  A 2 channel scope can work but the trick is to be very selective about what signal to select.  To compare relationships the bare minimum of channels is 2.  I have a couple of 2 ch's and a 4 ch I would say overall the 4 ch is easier to use since much more can be observed at once.

If the budget only allows a 2ch a 4ch could always be added later on.  That is what I did and in a few rare situations I have all my Pico's hooked up.

If you have any specific questions feel free to ask.

Sam
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
top4
Senior Member
Picogroup
***
Offline



Posts: 222

Ellwood city pa, Tennessee, USA
Ellwood city pa
Tennessee
USA

Gender: male
Re: question on scope vs scanner
Reply #5 - Mar 6th, 2013 at 8:07am
 
  When it comes to a scope buy a pico from Tom one and done! Like you I was looking around befor I bought mine (a 2 channel my bad) I will up grade soon. I got lucky when I found a sat. morning show on AM with John Gillespie he told me about autonerdz and the pico he even let me go to his shop and check it out. Sold!  As far as a scanner I have a solus pro and do like but the updates are a killer I am looking at A&E   now we shal see. good luck
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jamez
Senior Member
Picogroup
***
Offline



Posts: 155

Kawartha Lakes, Ontario, Canada
Kawartha Lakes
Ontario
Canada

Gender: male
Re: question on scope vs scanner
Reply #6 - Mar 6th, 2013 at 9:09pm
 
As far as I'm concerned both a quality scanner and a quality scope are vital.

4 channel is worth the extra cost.


I wouldn't bother with the pegysis. The scope is just ok, and the scanner is just.... ok. It is slow to connect and very bulky. We have both genysis and the pegysis at work, the genysis can do everything the pegysis does.
Back to top
 

James
 
IP Logged
 
jarvissamuel
Super Nerd
Picogroup
*****
Offline


I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 1,154

Denver Colorado, Colorado, USA
Denver Colorado
Colorado
USA

Re: question on scope vs scanner
Reply #7 - Mar 7th, 2013 at 7:14am
 
Forgot I did this awhile back.  This was shortly after the Pegisys came out.  The tool tested was a Matco version.  This was one of the earlier version and may have been improved over time. 

I did the video clip after demoing the scanner a week.  The scan tool portion was hit or miss but the scope was better than the Genisys version of the scope.  One thing I thought was lacking was the ability to manipulate the scope capture after recording and this in one place the Pico equipment/software excels.



Sam
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brad_m
Guru Member
****
Offline



Posts: 474

Townsville, Queensland, Australia
Townsville
Queensland
Australia

Gender: male
Re: question on scope vs scanner
Reply #8 - Mar 8th, 2013 at 2:55am
 
If you can't afford a 4ch yet, put it off and keep saving.      
I learned (am learning) with a 4ch turd as some people like to call it (but there are no scanner scope combos on the market for what I paid for my modis, nor could I have bought a scanner and scope for the price either).
I think had I bought 2 ch I would have become frustrated with it very fast.
I've had a number of jobs where the third and even 4th channels were vital.


Also from my experience If you have a scanner that will cover your scanner needs, by a pico kit from here.
If you need a new scanner to fill some gaps and you can cover those gaps with a scanner scope combo, then get the combo.
Almost any scope is better then no scope at all.  Most people here will tell you that as far as hand held scopes go Snap-ons product is about as good as it gets. 
There are some people that will just regurgitate the turd line over and over without taking your individual situation into account.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
kicksbutt
Guru Member
Picogroup
****
Offline


I'm an Autonerd

Posts: 252

litchfield park az, Arizona, USA
litchfield park az
Arizona
USA

Re: question on scope vs scanner
Reply #9 - Mar 10th, 2013 at 11:42am
 
thanks to all for your comments I guess I will continue to save my pennies for a four channel scope. I appreciate all your knowledge hope to continue to learn until I can afford to get one
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brad_m
Guru Member
****
Offline



Posts: 474

Townsville, Queensland, Australia
Townsville
Queensland
Australia

Gender: male
Re: question on scope vs scanner
Reply #10 - Mar 17th, 2013 at 8:02pm
 
kicksbutt wrote on Mar 10th, 2013 at 11:42am:
I will continue to save my pennies for a four channel scope




I believe you have made a wise choice.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BMW Scott
Super Nerd
Picogroup
*****
Offline



Posts: 561

High Point, NC, North Carolina, USA
High Point, NC
North Carolina
USA

Gender: male
Re: question on scope vs scanner
Reply #11 - Mar 23rd, 2013 at 6:09pm
 
I'm curious, are you working as a tech or do you own a shop.  The reason I'm asking is because I believe both a scanner and scope should be shop tools, but I also realize it doesn't always go that way.  I just purchased a 4 ch kit from Tom and waited until I could afford it before getting it.  I wouldn't have it any other way.  If you are a tech then I would also recommend purchasing the scope.  Scanners also require updates and that can get costly.  There's not really any updates for scopes, unless you want more accessories or a new model.  The shop I work for has several scan tools both factory level and aftermarket.  Nothing compares to factory level scan tool, but they are pricey.  Nothing also compares to a picoscope.  I have gotten so frustrated using snap-on's scopes and it wasn't in my shops budget to purchase another scope, so I purchased my own and don't regret it for a second.

HTH
Back to top
 

Scott J Hicks
 
IP Logged
 
Jamez
Senior Member
Picogroup
***
Offline



Posts: 155

Kawartha Lakes, Ontario, Canada
Kawartha Lakes
Ontario
Canada

Gender: male
Re: question on scope vs scanner
Reply #12 - Mar 23rd, 2013 at 7:58pm
 
Hey Scott.

While I agree with you 100% about scope and scanner being shop tools, sadly that is not always the way it pans out.

Like many techs, I provide my own scope, aftermarket scan tools and a couple OEs for what I work on the most.

I pay for it by subletting all programing and special functions the shops normally couldn't perform back to them.
Back to top
 

James
 
IP Logged
 
Brad_m
Guru Member
****
Offline



Posts: 474

Townsville, Queensland, Australia
Townsville
Queensland
Australia

Gender: male
Re: question on scope vs scanner
Reply #13 - Mar 23rd, 2013 at 8:55pm
 
Jamez wrote on Mar 23rd, 2013 at 7:58pm:
Hey Scott.

While I agree with you 100% about scope and scanner being shop tools, sadly that is not always the way it pans out.

Like many techs, I provide my own scope, aftermarket scan tools and a couple OEs for what I work on the most.

I pay for it by subletting all programing and special functions the shops normally couldn't perform back to them.



That's the only way I would have ever carried my own scanners or scopes, charge the use of them back to the shop.
Or have a higher pay rate then the guys that don't own them.

But I'm the owner now, so it's all shop tools.  Even that pesky little 8mm spanner that I keep loosing is shop tools now.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
kicksbutt
Guru Member
Picogroup
****
Offline


I'm an Autonerd

Posts: 252

litchfield park az, Arizona, USA
litchfield park az
Arizona
USA

Re: question on scope vs scanner
Reply #14 - Mar 24th, 2013 at 7:43pm
 
I am a little fellow working out of my garage right now. trying to get my own thing going so money is a issue as always. also I seem to be a sucker for hard cases that people can't afford to fix or some other shop wants to take advantage of a situation and don't really fix the problem. I feel for the people and end up not getting paid what I should. which adds to the money issues. its a vicious little circle. drives my wife crazy but at least I can sleep at night. most of the time that is  Smiley
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged