| The Autonerdz Community Forums | |
|
https://yabb.autonerdz.com/cgi/yabb2//YaBB.pl
General Public Area >> PicoScope >> PQ334 vs WPS500 https://yabb.autonerdz.com/cgi/yabb2//YaBB.pl?num=1701529133 Message started by Stafo on Dec 2nd, 2023 at 6:58am |
|
|
Title: PQ334 vs WPS500 Post by Stafo on Dec 2nd, 2023 at 6:58am
Hello, is it worth buying the PQ334 pressure transducer as a second tool to my WPS500?
Will I get similar captures from both tools, if measuring from the same source? What I want to know is, has anyone compare these two transducers? I like the idea of not having to recharge the battery, but want to be sure that I can use them together and don't have to worry about different results. |
|
Title: Re: PQ334 vs WPS500 Post by TrevorSchlientz on Dec 4th, 2023 at 7:16am |
|
Title: Re: PQ334 vs WPS500 Post by Stafo on Dec 4th, 2023 at 10:19am TrevorSchlientz wrote on Dec 4th, 2023 at 7:16am:
I did read that but doesn't give me confidence in purchasing this transducer. I was hoping someone else had used it. I will hold off buying this for now. |
|
Title: Re: PQ334 vs WPS500 Post by Grant Baker on Dec 4th, 2023 at 12:26pm
See the pdf shared by larkin in the thread linked by Trevor. The pdf suggests the PQ334 has a reponse rate of 1ms. As compared to the WPS500X that has a 100us response rate in range 1 and 2. Tom Roberts has demonstrated the response rate as closer to 80us on the WPS500X.
Since larkin owns a PQ334 and a WPS500X, you should contact him directly through his forum user profile with an email. He may have done more testing with the PQ334 since that thread was active. |
|
The Autonerdz Community Forums » Powered by YaBB 2.5 AE! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved. |